Generative repair: everyday infrastructuring between DIY citizen initiatives and institutional arrangements
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Supporting debates over citizen initiatives
Citizen/popular initiatives provide a way for the inclusion of constitutional or statutory proposals on the ballot (e.g., at an election) if enough signatures are collected in support of the proposal [1, 2, 3, 4]. Once citizens are enabled to digitally sign such initiatives remotely, the next challenge will be to provide support for verified eligible citizens to debate on running initiatives. I...
متن کاملCreating Friction: Infrastructuring Civic Engagement in Everyday Life
This paper introduces the theoretical lens of the everyday to intersect and extend the emerging bodies of research on contestational design and infrastructures of civic engagement. Our analysis of social theories of everyday life suggests a design space that distinguishes ‘privileged moments’ of civic engagement from a more holistic understanding of the everyday as ‘product-residue.’ We analyze...
متن کاملThe conceptual model of the relationship between institutional transparency, citizen trust and satisfaction (A case study of Tehran city, Iran)
Trust, along with transparency, is an important indicator of a satisfactory relationship between a government and the public. Considering transparency as the key to trust in government, the purpose of this paper is to postulate a link between transparency and trust taking into account satisfaction as a psychological factor. This paper tries to find the answer of these questions: “Is there...
متن کاملInstitutional Rating in Everyday Life
Rating on the Internet seems to be a rather new kind of activity. However, traditionally a quite large number of institutional rating mechanisms are established. We have studied a number of such rating methods to gain some insights about the role rating can play in the actions of of individuals and institutions.
متن کاملSpatial Data Infrastructuring: praxis between dilemmas
The paper argues that SDI can best be understood in terms of praxis more than as technological artefact. Because of the many different and often conflicting views of reality, interests and other values between the many heterogeneous actors that are involved, SDI development causes inevitably paradoxes and dilemmas. The paper assumes that SDI is context specific but also has the generic properti...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: CoDesign
سال: 2021
ISSN: 1571-0882,1745-3755
DOI: 10.1080/15710882.2021.1912778